Discuss photo: Photo 1159

Well I have to say when I first saw this image my first impression was that it had to be a slow shutter speed combined with some persron who went through the field of view at that moment. But then I saw the EXIF data...

The shutter speed is less than 1/6th of a second, and no flash was used so the natural light from in the room was enough.

For something to cover that distance in 1/6th of a second would be highly unlikely. Very interesting photo, certainly defies natural logic.

it does... and it makes me nauseous too.. ( not because of the image quality.. but the energy it reminds me of being on a super speed tea cup ride)

I agree with you CC, if it were a person, you would think a section of the blurred image, would be unblurred ( the non-moving parts)

Have you had any unexplained occurrences in the home?