Error
  • Error loading Components:
Welcome, Guest
Username Password: Remember me

Reason I don’t like most Digital Evidence
(0 viewing) 

TOPIC: Reason I don’t like most Digital Evidence

Re: Reason I don’t like most Digital Evidence 14 years, 1 month ago #51

  • tyrstag
  • OFFLINE
  • Senior Boarder
  • Posts: 64
  • Karma: 2
Amanda_O wrote:
TressesOfNephthys wrote:
Oh this bottle of rum in your cabinet is haunted by the ghost of Captain Morgan himself. You see, his ghostly image is right here on the label. I'm going to have to take it and put it in my museum as well.

So THATS why I am being haunted by a three headed parrot that wears lipstick........


No, that was a Jimmy Buffet concert.

Re: Reason I don’t like most Digital Evidence 14 years, 1 month ago #52

  • tyrstag
  • OFFLINE
  • Senior Boarder
  • Posts: 64
  • Karma: 2
Angelina_Rose1 wrote:
I don't think I would bring stuff home either, that's all I need is the dead nuts running around my home, I like to use old recorders like the one I have is a COBY cassette recorder, when I went to the cemetery to see my ma I asked a few questions it was day they close at night, and all I got was knocking sounds, had to turn it off at times there next to the Burbank airport, but the knocking was kind of creepy, no voices but I think that a recorder old fashion works just fine than digital but then that is me. I want to go again soon and when I do I usually leave the recorder there recording and I go walking around the cemetery, when I do I will see if I can download it it being a old recorder and all..


If you're going to use an analog tape recorder, just make sure you change the tapes regularly. Old tapes MAY not completely erase and what may sound like an EVP could be an old recording that wasn't completely erased. Kind of like a double exposure on a film camera.

Interestingly, the technical term for hearing an old recording under a new recording is called "Ghosting".

Re: Reason I don’t like most Digital Evidence 14 years, 1 month ago #53

  • AngelaAdame
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 133
  • Karma: 4
interesting, and thank you, I'll make sure to take all new tapes and not use the old ones over again:)

Re: Reason I don’t like most Digital Evidence 14 years, 1 month ago #54

  • tyrstag
  • OFFLINE
  • Senior Boarder
  • Posts: 64
  • Karma: 2
You CAN reuse tapes. But just be aware that the older they get, there's more risk of "Ghosting". I'm talking dozens of times, not once or twice.

Re: Reason I don’t like most Digital Evidence 14 years, 1 month ago #55

  • Amanda_O
  • OFFLINE
  • Senior Boarder
  • Posts: 76
  • Karma: 2
tyrstag wrote:
Amanda_O wrote:
TressesOfNephthys wrote:
Oh this bottle of rum in your cabinet is haunted by the ghost of Captain Morgan himself. You see, his ghostly image is right here on the label. I'm going to have to take it and put it in my museum as well.

So THATS why I am being haunted by a three headed parrot that wears lipstick........


No, that was a Jimmy Buffet concert.


AHHHH parrot heads...my mistake.

Re: Reason I don’t like most Digital Evidence 14 years, 1 month ago #56

  • AngelaAdame
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 133
  • Karma: 4
good to know I also never heard of Ghosting, hehe new word, I also have a digital camera Kodak 12x ls . not sure if that is a good one but I want to start taking pics when I go there also * cemetery* but I also know to expect nothing, I guess the best evidence is when I hear them whisper and see them haha, but your advice I like thanks,

Re: Reason I don’t like most Digital Evidence 14 years, 1 month ago #57

  • Steven Matrix
Wes_Forsythe wrote:
John does have a good reputation amongst us (though there are plenty who would disagree).

He has been doing the haunted item thing for a long time so I will allow for the sake of arguement that he is sincere and occasionally accurate. My problem is that while I believe in attachments I tend to think that a spirit is more often than not attached to a place, event, or even a person(s). I do believe I have encountered one that was attached to a kitchen cabinet (seriously) once.

Maybe the show is highly "cherry picked" as to which locations they show us, but I do not believe at this point based on my own experience that object attachment applies to a majority of hauntings as the show would lead one to believe.

But, and I AM NO EXPERT ON THIS, the only thing a glass lid is going to do is keep an object dust free. I mean the ghosts aren't "living" in the objects like Genies are they?


I personally know of a person who was told to get rid of a beautiful chair they had as there was something attached to it. They didn't want to get rid of it and took it to their dad's house [I can see if it was her mother in-law, but her dad??? Lol]. Anyway, when she took the chair to her father's house, all of the clocks in the house stopped.

I don't know how common it is for a spirit to be attached to an object; but after this incident, I'm also convinced that it happens at least at times.

While I don't know John and am not in your type of circle Wes, I would like to know how he got a "good reputation". I've seen similar instances where people say others have a good reputation and brag on another's platform. My question is "Who says so?" I would have to disagree that he's a good demonologist [at this time anyway] as who has the proof that he is? Nobody.

I've found [according to one site, which lifted the person's platform first] that a demonologist is involved with religion [something I left after 20 years] and due to that religion's chief figure, they have power over demons. I will not go into religion so as not to offend; but the reality of it is that no group of people has any power over the spirits called demons more than anyone else. How do you know Matrix? Because we are all entitled to our own opinions; we are not however entitled to our own facts, regardless of how much "written" information exists about those who want the masses to believe their legitimacy.

I think this field, like everything else, could be more legit if some would leave the titles/egos at the front door.

Just one man's opinion.

Re: Reason I don’t like most Digital Evidence 14 years, 1 month ago #58

  • tyrstag
  • OFFLINE
  • Senior Boarder
  • Posts: 64
  • Karma: 2
[quote="Steven Matrix" post=5803]Wes_Forsythe wrote:
John does have a good reputation amongst us (though there are plenty who would disagree).



I've found [according to one site, which lifted the person's platform first] that a demonologist is involved with religion [something I left after 20 years] and due to that religion's chief figure, they have power over demons. I will not go into religion so as not to offend; but the reality of it is that no group of people has any power over the spirits called demons more than anyone else. How do you know Matrix? Because we are all entitled to our own opinions; we are not however entitled to our own facts, regardless of how much "written" information exists about those who want the masses to believe their legitimacy.

I think this field, like everything else, could be more legit if some would leave the titles/egos at the front door.

Just one man's opinion.


I agree with you 100%, I hate the term "Demonologist". The original meaning of "Daimon" was "Divine Power" or what we would now call "Super Natural". It didn't come to mean Evil until somewhere around the time of the inquisition and burning times.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Tresses Of Nephthys

Re: Reason I don’t like most Digital Evidence 14 years, 1 month ago #59

  • AngelaAdame
  • OFFLINE
  • Expert Boarder
  • Posts: 133
  • Karma: 4
wow this was well said, I do agree that people can't make demons go, they are angels and mankind they laugh at, but you said it well:) I did read in a book I can't think of it but it said only God,, St. Micheal, Angel of Death can get rid of Demon s and the dead that are a pain to us all, darn can't think of the book , but I do like the show but a little hard believing items can be haunted, I have allot of old stuff I got at an antique place and I'm lucky so far but it does make me think now if I should get anything I see and like.

Re: Reason I don’t like most Digital Evidence 14 years, 1 month ago #60

  • osty
  • OFFLINE
  • Senior Boarder
  • Posts: 50
  • Karma: 2
tyrstag wrote:
Angelina_Rose1 wrote:
I don't think I would bring stuff home either, that's all I need is the dead nuts running around my home, I like to use old recorders like the one I have is a COBY cassette recorder, when I went to the cemetery to see my ma I asked a few questions it was day they close at night, and all I got was knocking sounds, had to turn it off at times there next to the Burbank airport, but the knocking was kind of creepy, no voices but I think that a recorder old fashion works just fine than digital but then that is me. I want to go again soon and when I do I usually leave the recorder there recording and I go walking around the cemetery, when I do I will see if I can download it it being a old recorder and all..


If you're going to use an analog tape recorder, just make sure you change the tapes regularly. Old tapes MAY not completely erase and what may sound like an EVP could be an old recording that wasn't completely erased. Kind of like a double exposure on a film camera.

Interestingly, the technical term for hearing an old recording under a new recording is called "Ghosting".


Just to add, ghosting can also happen as kind of a bleed through if you record on both sides of the tape. So when you record just use one side of the tape.
The following user(s) said Thank You: tyrstag
Time to create page: 0.58 seconds


Close Window   X
Protected by R Antispam

escort bayan muğla aydın escort bayan escort bayan çanakkale balıkesir escort bayan escort tekirdağ bayan escort bayan gebze escort bayan mersin buca escort bayan edirne escort bayan