crystalcross wrote:
Well, I think what you're running into there (aside from the quest for ratings) is the sad fact that public-eye paranormal investigation these days is divided into two groups.
#1 - The evidence based, scientific, high-tech investigation groups.
#2 - The touchy-feely medium, subjective evidence based groups.
Very seldom to you find paranormal groups on TV which employ a healthy combination of these two. Either they tend to feel that mediums and sensitives have no room in an investigation because what they see or feel can not be quantitatively recorded as evidence, or they don't want to be bothered with evidencial investigation at all.
The truth is that the best investigation employs a great marriage of the two. Sensitives are great resources. They do not need to be employed as a source of evidence, but rather as a tool to find and help interpret where to look. And once you do make contact in some way, to help communicate and create resultion where its desired. After all, if someone asks for help (dead or alive) you don't simply ignore them.
Well said my friend. I'll discuss this with you in more detail this weekend. I'm of the belief that the results of an investigation hinge on the initial intentions of the investigators themselves. Spirits are more intuitive than we are.